Compare annual SEC 10-K risk disclosures, inspect the original wording, and investigate questions for investment research, client work and published analysis.
Covers Item 1A risk factors for the companies and comparison years in our directory. Coverage and history vary by company.
Investigate changes in the companies you follow. Compare the wording across available annual filings and check the original evidence before drawing conclusions.
Research a client's public-company competitors. Compare their disclosure changes to develop questions for a competitor briefing or a new assignment.
Investigate how public companies describe suppliers, geographic exposure and trade restrictions. Use the filing evidence to prepare questions for a supplier or client review.
Find company examples for industry reporting. Follow a disclosure change back to both annual filings and distinguish new wording from a newly emerging risk.
Return for new assignments, additional companies and newly available annual comparisons. Available history helps you revisit earlier wording as your research questions change.
Companies with added risk factors matching AI keywords across cached comparisons.
236 companies →Companies with added risk factors matching cybersecurity keywords across cached comparisons.
231 companies →Companies with added risk factors matching supply chain keywords across cached comparisons.
245 companies →Companies with added risk factors matching tariff or trade policy keywords across cached comparisons.
131 companies →Counts cover all cached comparison years. Added means an unmatched risk factor, not the first mention of AI in a company’s filings. Matching can reflect a split, renamed, or reorganised factor. Inspect the matches and check coverage and filing dates.
Ranked by the sum of deterministic disclosure-change scores across each company's latest comparison. This total also reflects how many factors changed. Direction and themes come from the labeled AI brief.
Factors without a prior-year match. Check whether the wording was reorganised elsewhere; an added factor does not establish a new risk.
Prior-year factors without a current-year match. Check whether the wording moved elsewhere; a removed factor does not establish resolved exposure.
Changes within matched factors. Inspect the previous and current wording and follow the links to both annual filings.
Inspect a source-linked example comparison and see how an edit relates to the wording already in the prior filing.
Connect Claude, Cursor, or another MCP-compatible agent to https://riskdiff.com/api/mcp to query risk signals, company diffs, and filing changes. Matches link to cached comparisons and source filings. Automated extraction and AI interpretations can contain errors.